Roman v. 233 Broadway Owners, LLC
99 A.D.3d 887, 951 N.Y.2d 904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 2012·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The plaintiffs contention that the Supreme Court erred in granting the defendant ADT Security Services, Inc., leave to serve and file successive motions for summary judgment is improperly raised for the first time on this appeal and, therefore, is not properly before this Court.
There is no merit to the plaintiffs remaining contention that her note of issue should be reinstated. Angiolillo, J.R, Dickerson, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roman v. 233 Broadway Owners, LLC, 99 A.D.3d 887, 951 N.Y.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
99 A.D.3d 887 (Roman v. 233 Broadway Owners, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kennedy v. Hubsher
2021 NY Slip Op 02142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)