Roman Hector v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 2025·No. 4D2025-2168·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ROMAN HECTOR,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2168

[October 15, 2025]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-2416CF10A.

Roman Hector, Blountstown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), review granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024); Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025) (holding that even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively).

GERBER, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roman Hector v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Roman Hector v. State of Florida (Roman Hector v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erlinger v. United States
602 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 2024)