Romalis Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedMay 18, 2012
DocketE2012-00426-COA-R3-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Romalis Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction (Romalis Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Romalis Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

ROMALIS GRAY v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, et al.

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Morgan County No. 11-159 Hon. Frank V. Williams, III., Chancellor

No. E2012-00426-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MAY 18, 2012

Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

H ERSCHEL P ICKENS F RANKS, P.J., C HARLES D. S USANO, J R., J., and D. M ICHAEL S WINEY, J.

Romalis Gray, Henning, Tennessee, pro se.

Dianne Stamey Dycus, and James Lee Pope, Nashville, Tennessee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Appellant, Romalis Gray, pro se, filed a Notice of Appeal in this Court and Motions. On April 19, 2012 this Court ordered the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed and recites that the record reveals that the Notice of Appeal was not filed within 30 days following the Final Judgment in the Trial Court.

Appellant wrote a letter to the Court which essentially acknowledges that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed with the Court.

1 Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides: "This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion it shall be designated 'MEMORANDUM OPINION,' shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any unrelated case" An untimely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction. See, Tenn.R.App.P.2; Tenn.R.App.P.4(a); also see, Cobb v. Beier, 944 S.W.2d 343, 344 n.2 (Tenn. 1997).

It is therefore Ordered and Adjudged that this appeal be and hereby is dismissed. The cost of the appeal is assessed to Romalis Gray.

PER CURIAM

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cobb v. Beier
944 S.W.2d 343 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Romalis Gray v. Tennessee Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romalis-gray-v-tennessee-department-of-correction-tennctapp-2012.