Romain v. Long Island Railroad
This text of 152 A.D. 891 (Romain v. Long Island Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that unless there was no headlight burning upon the locomotive of the train which struck plaintiff, he has not shown himself to be free from negligence contributing to the injury. The absence of such headlight is not only not established by a fair preponderance of evidence, but the great weight of disinterested testimony is to the contrary, and that such light was burning. Burr, Thomas, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A.D. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romain-v-long-island-railroad-nyappdiv-1912.