Romagnano v. Childers
This text of Romagnano v. Childers (Romagnano v. Childers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0534 _____________________________
CHASE ANDERSON ROMAGNANO,
Petitioner,
v.
PAMELA LYNN CHILDERS,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto—Original Jurisdiction.
September 11, 2024
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of quo warranto filed February 28, 2024, Petitioner seeks to challenge the election results of the 2020 contest for Clerk of Circuit Court for Escambia County. We conclude Petitioner unreasonably delayed filing and deny the petition on that basis. See Warren v. DeSantis, 365 So. 3d 1137, 1142 (Fla. 2023). RAY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Chase Romagnano, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Romagnano v. Childers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/romagnano-v-childers-fladistctapp-2024.