Romachkine v. Holder

366 F. App'x 845
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2010·No. 07-72758·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cao Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the omission from Wang’s asylum application of her interrogations and beating by the Chinese police, see Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), and Wang’s failure to explain these omissions when given the opportunity, see Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 2005). In the absence of credible testimony, Wang’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,1156 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Romachkine v. Holder, 366 F. App'x 845 (9th Cir. 2010).

366 F. App'x 845 (Romachkine v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
348 F.3d 1153 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
378 F.3d 959 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Preet Kaur v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
418 F.3d 1061 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Husyev v. Mukasey
528 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)