Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley

310 So. 2d 316, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13967

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1975

DocketNo. X-191

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 310 So. 2d 316 (Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley, 310 So. 2d 316, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner seeks reversal of the order of respondent disapproving its application for a vendor’s liquor license for the reason that the petitioner’s sole stockholder owned stock in an alcoholic beverage manufacturing corporation.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that the order sought to be reviewed herein was based upon substantial, competent evidence and was not issued erroneously or arbitrarily. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner seeks reversal of the order of respondent disapproving its application for a vendor’s liquor license for the reason that the petitioner’s sole stockholder owned stock in an alcoholic beverage manufacturing corporation.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that the order sought to be reviewed herein was based upon substantial, competent evidence and was not issued erroneously or arbitrarily. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 So. 2d 316, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolyat-corp-v-ashley-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack