Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley

310 So. 2d 316, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13967

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1975·No. No. X-191·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner seeks reversal of the order of respondent disapproving its application for a vendor’s liquor license for the reason that the petitioner’s sole stockholder owned stock in an alcoholic beverage manufacturing corporation.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that the order sought to be reviewed herein was based upon substantial, competent evidence and was not issued erroneously or arbitrarily. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner seeks reversal of the order of respondent disapproving its application for a vendor’s liquor license for the reason that the petitioner’s sole stockholder owned stock in an alcoholic beverage manufacturing corporation.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that the order sought to be reviewed herein was based upon substantial, competent evidence and was not issued erroneously or arbitrarily. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley, 310 So. 2d 316, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

310 So. 2d 316 (Rolyat Corp. v. Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related