Rolston v. State

186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 135
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 17, 2004
DocketCR 04-588
StatusPublished

This text of 186 S.W.3d 236 (Rolston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolston v. State, 186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 135 (Ark. 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Johnifer Rolston, by his attorney, Joseph P. iam. III, has filed a motion for belated appeal. His attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.W.3d 236, 358 Ark. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolston-v-state-ark-2004.