Rolondo Cuevas-Flores v. State of Arkansas
This text of 2023 Ark. App. 347 (Rolondo Cuevas-Flores v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 347 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS No. CR-22-746 Opinion Delivered July 26, 2023 ROLONDO CUEVAS-FLORES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 04CR-21-1484]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE BRAD L. KARREN, APPELLEE JUDGE
CONTEMPT CITATION AND SANCTION ISSUED
PER CURIAM
When Rolondo Cuevas-Flores moved this court for the fourth time to enforce a
writ of certiorari to complete the record on appeal that we first issued to court reporter
Sharon Fields some seven months ago, this court granted the fourth motion, set a deadline
of 12 June 2023 for Ms. Fields to file the transcript with this court’s clerk, and ordered her
to appear before this court on 17 July 2023, at 10:00 a.m., in the courtroom of the Arkansas
Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, and show cause why she should not be held in
contempt for failing to comply with the original writ of certiorari or any one of the
extensions. See Cuevas-Flores v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 347 (show-cause order).
Before issuing the show-cause order, we warned Ms. Fields—in the third extension
she received in April—that the failure to meet the new May deadline “may result in a show-
cause order being issued.” When Ms. Fields did not produce the transcript in May, this
court simultaneously issued a show-cause order when it granted the fourth extension (to
June 12), and scheduled a hearing. Ms. Fields appeared before this court on July 17. She had by then prepared the
transcript, met the June 12 deadline, and therefore finally complied with the original writ
we issued mid-December 2022. When the court asked whether Ms. Fields pleaded guilty
or not guilty to violating this court’s orders, she pleaded guilty, and was given the
opportunity to speak to the court for the purpose of mitigating the severity of any potential
sanction. She did so.
Having considered the docketed filings in this case and the show-cause proceedings
held on July 17, this court finds Ms. Sharon Fields in willful contempt of the Arkansas Court
of Appeals. She repeatedly failed to comply with this court’s orders to complete the
transcripts Mr. Cuevas-Flores designated as necessary to pursue his appeal of a criminal
conviction. Ms. Fields’s repeated delays in preparing the designated material prejudiced the
efficient administration of justice. The court acknowledges the many responsibilities that
circuit courts, and their staff, handle daily. But a busy court schedule alone cannot excuse
the protracted delay that this criminal case has experienced during the transcript-preparation
phase.
THEREFORE, the court hereby orders Sharon Fields to pay a $1,500 sanction. The
sanction must be paid to “The Arkansas Court of Appeals” in the form of a cashier’s check
or money order. The entire sanction must be received by the clerk’s office by close of
business on 30 August 2023. The clerk of this court will provide a receipt to Ms. Fields
when she tenders full payment.
Contempt citation and sanction issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ark. App. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolondo-cuevas-flores-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2023.