Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rolnick v. Rolnick

223 A.D. 772

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion for alimony, counsel fee, etc., denied without prejudice, without costs. The record herein does not show reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail upen the trial and, therefore, the granting of temporary alimony, counsel fee, etc., was improper. (De Vide v. De Vide, 186 App. Div. 814.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion for alimony, counsel fee, etc., denied without prejudice, without costs. The record herein does not show reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail upen the trial and, therefore, the granting of temporary alimony, counsel fee, etc., was improper. (De Vide v. De Vide, 186 App. Div. 814.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Rolnick v. Rolnick, 223 A.D. 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

223 A.D. 772 (Rolnick v. Rolnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related