Rolls Royce Corporation v. Vicky Daugherty

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 16, 2005
Docket13-04-00560-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rolls Royce Corporation v. Vicky Daugherty (Rolls Royce Corporation v. Vicky Daugherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolls Royce Corporation v. Vicky Daugherty, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-04-560-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION,                                  Appellant,

                                           v.

VICKY DAUGHERTY, ET AL.,                                     Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

                  On appeal from the 214th District Court

                           of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

  Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez

                             Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION, perfected an appeal from an order entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 03-1517-F.   After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss and remand.  In the motion, the parties state that they have entered into a settlement agreement in this matter.  The parties request that the appeal be dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court for proceedings to effectuate the settlement agreement.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and  the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties= settlement agreement.        

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of June, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rolls Royce Corporation v. Vicky Daugherty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolls-royce-corporation-v-vicky-daugherty-texapp-2005.