Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, : No. 88 EM 2016 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF : BERNARD M. KELLY, DECEASED, : CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANNA MEE KELLY, DECEASED, : LINDA JENNY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE : ESTATE OF DAVID ERNEST JENNY, : JR., DECEASED, CAROLYN G. : WOODLAND AND LAWRENCE J. : WOODLAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : CARL ROBERT WOODLAND, : DECEASED, ROBINSON HELICOPTER : COMPANY, INC., HONEYWELL : INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND TRIUMPH : ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Review is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C. (Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.