Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.
This text of Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C. (Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, : No. 88 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF : BERNARD M. KELLY, DECEASED, : CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANNA MEE KELLY, DECEASED, : LINDA JENNY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE : ESTATE OF DAVID ERNEST JENNY, : JR., DECEASED, CAROLYN G. : WOODLAND AND LAWRENCE J. : WOODLAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : CARL ROBERT WOODLAND, : DECEASED, ROBINSON HELICOPTER : COMPANY, INC., HONEYWELL : INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND TRIUMPH : ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Review is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolls-royce-corporation-v-kelly-c-pa-2016.