Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 16, 2016·No. 88 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, : No. 88 EM 2016 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF : BERNARD M. KELLY, DECEASED, : CATHERINE KELLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE : OF LEANNA MEE KELLY, DECEASED, : LINDA JENNY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE : ESTATE OF DAVID ERNEST JENNY, : JR., DECEASED, CAROLYN G. : WOODLAND AND LAWRENCE J. : WOODLAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF : CARL ROBERT WOODLAND, : DECEASED, ROBINSON HELICOPTER : COMPANY, INC., HONEYWELL : INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND TRIUMPH : ENGINE CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Review is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C., (Pa. 2016).

Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C. (Rolls-Royce Corporation v. Kelly, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.