Rollison v. State

453 So. 2d 447, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14390
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1984·No. No. 83-545·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but without prejudice to appellant’s right to apply for relief under the terms of Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, as concerns his sentence.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur. HURLEY, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rollison v. State, 453 So. 2d 447, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

453 So. 2d 447 (Rollison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1967)
DeLaPaz v. State
453 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Shade v. State
400 So. 2d 850 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Brady v. State
394 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Walker v. State
433 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)