Rollison v. . Alexander
108 S.E. 633, 182 N.C. 767, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 329
Opinion
An examination of the instant record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions. Upon the controverted issues of fact, the jury have answered in favor of the defendant; and we have found no material error which would warrant us in disturbing the result.
The appeal raises no new question of law and we conclude that the trial below must be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rollison v. . Alexander, 108 S.E. 633, 182 N.C. 767, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 329 (N.C. 1921).
108 S.E. 633 (Rollison v. . Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porter v. News and Courier Co.
115 S.E.2d 656 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)