Rollison v. . Alexander

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Rollison v. . Alexander

108 S.E. 633, 182 N.C. 767, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 329

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 12, 1921

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 633 (Rollison v. . Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rollison v. . Alexander, 108 S.E. 633, 182 N.C. 767, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 329 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiak.

An examination of the instant record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions. Upon the controverted issues of fact, the jury have answered in favor of the defendant; and we have found no material error which would warrant us in disturbing the result.

The appeal raises no new question of law and we conclude that the trial below must be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiak.

An examination of the instant record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to our decisions. Upon the controverted issues of fact, the jury have answered in favor of the defendant; and we have found no material error which would warrant us in disturbing the result.

The appeal raises no new question of law and we conclude that the trial below must be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 633, 182 N.C. 767, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollison-v-alexander-nc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack