Home/Supreme Court of Vermont/Rollins v. Walker

Rollins v. Walker

1 Brayt. 222
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided July 1, 1815·No. No. 2·Published

Opinion

DAMAGES for not building a house according to contract, cannot be off-set, under the Statute. Money voluntarily paief upon a note, given in consideration of a contract to build a house which has not been performed, cannot be recovered back in an action for money had and received.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rollins v. Walker, 1 Brayt. 222 (Vt. 1815).

1 Brayt. 222 (Rollins v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.