Rollins v. Thomas
This text of 333 So. 2d 62 (Rollins v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We now visit this case for a second time. (See Thomas v. Rollins, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 298 So.2d 186) Since our prior opinion, a trial has been held on the merits following which the trial court entered a final judgment imposing a constructive trust in favor of appellees. From that final judgment this appeal is taken. An examination of the [63]*63record reveals conflicting evidence. It was the province of the trial judge to resolve that conflict. If appellees’ version of the evidence is accepted as true the requisites for a constructive trust were established. We find no error.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
333 So. 2d 62, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-v-thomas-fladistctapp-1976.