Rollins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rollins v. State

567 S.W.2d 736, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2835

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 1978

DocketNo. KCD 29498

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.2d 736 (Rollins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rollins v. State, 567 S.W.2d 736, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2835 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Henry Rollins filed a motion under Rule 27.26 to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence previously ordered for dispensing marijuana. His original conviction was affirmed in State v. Rollins, 449 S.W.2d 585 (Mo.1970).

The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. A careful review of the record reveals the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Henry Rollins filed a motion under Rule 27.26 to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence previously ordered for dispensing marijuana. His original conviction was affirmed in State v. Rollins, 449 S.W.2d 585 (Mo.1970).

The trial court held an evidentiary hearing and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. A careful review of the record reveals the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.2d 736, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-v-state-moctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack