Rollins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rollins v. State

216 So. 3d 644, 2017 WL 1363953, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5065

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2017·No. No. 4D16-3811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 199 So.3d 546, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Cf. Kelsey v. State, 206 So.3d 5, 6 (Fla. 2016) (answering the following certified question, “Is a defendant whose original sentence violated Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), and who was subsequently resentenced prior to July 1, 2014, entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the provisions of chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida,” in the affirmative).

Gross, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Davis v. State, 199 So.3d 546, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Cf. Kelsey v. State, 206 So.3d 5, 6 (Fla. 2016) (answering the following certified question, “Is a defendant whose original sentence violated Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), and who was subsequently resentenced prior to July 1, 2014, entitled to be resentenced pursuant to the provisions of chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida,” in the affirmative).

Gross, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Rollins v. State, 216 So. 3d 644, 2017 WL 1363953, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5065 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

216 So. 3d 644 (Rollins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related