Rollins v. State
This text of Rollins v. State (Rollins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DUANE ROLLINS, § § Defendant Below, § No. 532, 2014 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for New Castle County § Cr. No. 121201904 Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 28, 2014 Decided: October 28, 2014
ORDER
This 28th day of October 2014, it appears to the Court that on September 22,
2014, the appellant, Duane Rollins, filed a notice of appeal from a Superior Court
order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, his motion to dismiss
counsel, and his counsel’s motion to withdraw. The appellant has not yet been
sentenced. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause
why his appeal should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear
an interlocutory criminal appeal. The appellant has not responded to the notice to
show cause within the required ten-day period and therefore dismissal of the
appeal is deemed to be unopposed. Dismissal of this appeal renders the appellant’s
requests for appointment of counsel and an extension to file his opening brief
moot. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),
that this appeal is DISMISSED and the appellant’s requests for appointment of
counsel and extension to file his opening brief are moot.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rollins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-v-state-del-2014.