Rollins v. . Bishop

76 N.C. 268
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 N.C. 268 (Rollins v. . Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rollins v. . Bishop, 76 N.C. 268 (N.C. 1877).

Opinion

Bynum, J.

* These four actions are instituted by the same plaintiffs for the same premises and under the same claim of title, as in the case of P. Rollins et al v. Ham Rollins and R. M. Henry, decided at the present term. The same questions are involved and the decision in that' case is referred to as the decision of the Court in these actions. If the defendants or either of them have been evicted on judgments obtained in these actions they are entitled to restitution of possession until the determination of the issue made in them all between the plaintiffs and R. M. Henry who has *269 applied and has the right to be made defendant either with or in the place of the tenants.

Error.

Per- Curiam. Venire ele novo.

*

Rollins v. Edward Sams; Rollins v. Bishop Johnson; Rollins v. James Bishop.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Wilkins
85 S.E.2d 892 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 N.C. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-v-bishop-nc-1877.