Rollins v. . Bishop

76 N.C. 268
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bynum, J.

* These four actions are instituted by the same plaintiffs for the same premises and under the same claim of title, as in the case of P. Rollins et al v. Ham Rollins and R. M. Henry, decided at the present term. The same questions are involved and the decision in that' case is referred to as the decision of the Court in these actions. If the defendants or either of them have been evicted on judgments obtained in these actions they are entitled to restitution of possession until the determination of the issue made in them all between the plaintiffs and R. M. Henry who has *269 applied and has the right to be made defendant either with or in the place of the tenants.

Error.

Per- Curiam. Venire ele novo.

*

Rollins v. Edward Sams; Rollins v. Bishop Johnson; Rollins v. James Bishop.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rollins v. . Bishop, 76 N.C. 268 (N.C. 1877).

76 N.C. 268 (Rollins v. . Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Wilkins
85 S.E.2d 892 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)