Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 1, 2016·No. 108 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

DONTE ROLLINS, : No. 108 EM 2016 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED.

The Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition is DENIED, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE to Petitioner to pursue similar relief in this Court following the impending

hearings before the common pleas court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., (Pa. 2016).

Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.