Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.
This text of Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
DONTE ROLLINS, : No. 108 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED.
The Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition is DENIED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE to Petitioner to pursue similar relief in this Court following the impending
hearings before the common pleas court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rollins, D. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-d-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2016.