Rollins Bedford Corp. v. Riley

913 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17036, 2005 WL 2806463
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 2005
DocketNo. 5D05-3237
StatusPublished

This text of 913 So. 2d 731 (Rollins Bedford Corp. v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rollins Bedford Corp. v. Riley, 913 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17036, 2005 WL 2806463 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for prohibition without prejudice to seek appellate review if access to the sealed records is granted. See Scott v. Nelson, 697 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

PROHIBITION DENIED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Nelson
697 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
913 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17036, 2005 WL 2806463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollins-bedford-corp-v-riley-fladistctapp-2005.