Rollin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rollin v. State

1935 OK CR 137, 50 P.2d 1151, 58 Okla. Crim. 106, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 11, 1935·No. No. A-8969.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error ivas convicted of the crime of having possession of a still worm, and received a sentence of thirty days in jail and a fine of $50 and costs.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on August 9, 1935. No brief has been filed in support of defendant’s assignments of error.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error ivas convicted of the crime of having possession of a still worm, and received a sentence of thirty days in jail and a fine of $50 and costs.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court on August 9, 1935. No brief has been filed in support of defendant’s assignments of error.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Rollin v. State, 1935 OK CR 137, 50 P.2d 1151, 58 Okla. Crim. 106, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 134 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

1935 OK CR 137 (Rollin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.