Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

2002 Ohio 69, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1204

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 2002

Docket2000-1978

StatusPublished

This text of 2002 Ohio 69 (Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 2002 Ohio 69, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1204 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Records at 94 Ohio St.3d 1204.]

ROLLIN, APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 2002-Ohio-69.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1978—Submitted November 14, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 99CA007313. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent. Instead of dismissing this case as improvidently allowed, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Hoffman Legal Group, L.L.C., W. Andrew Hoffman III and Douglas S. Hunter, for appellant. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Gregory E. O’Brien and Daniel A. Richards, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Records at 94 Ohio St.3d 1204.]

ROLLIN, APPELLANT, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Rollin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 2002-Ohio-69.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1978—Submitted November 14, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 99CA007313. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent. Instead of dismissing this case as improvidently allowed, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Hoffman Legal Group, L.L.C., W. Andrew Hoffman III and Douglas S. Hunter, for appellant. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Gregory E. O’Brien and Daniel A. Richards, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 69, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollin-v-nationwide-mut-ins-co-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack