Rollerson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rollerson v. Selsky

281 A.D.2d 735, 721 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2318

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 735 (Rollerson v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rollerson v. Selsky, 281 A.D.2d 735, 721 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of stolen property and possession of unauthorized valuables or property and, therefore, is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination finding him guilty of these charges (see, Matter of Grof v Goord, 278 AD2d 650; Matter of Pabon v Goord, 275 AD2d 824). Petitioner’s remaining arguments are unpreserved for our review (see, Matter of Kross v Goord, 278 AD2d 637) and, in any event, are without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charges of possession of stolen property and possession of unauthorized valuables or property and, therefore, is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination finding him guilty of these charges (see, Matter of Grof v Goord, 278 AD2d 650; Matter of Pabon v Goord, 275 AD2d 824). Petitioner’s remaining arguments are unpreserved for our review (see, Matter of Kross v Goord, 278 AD2d 637) and, in any event, are without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 735, 721 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollerson-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack