Roller v. Stanly
98 N.E.2d 705, 302 N.Y. 736, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 892
Opinion
Orders reversed and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted, with costs in all courts, upon the ground that, under the circumstances, here present, defendant was not guilty of any actionable misrepresentation and did not violate any fiduciary duty in his purchase of the assets of the partnership. Question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fund and Feoessel, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roller v. Stanly, 98 N.E.2d 705, 302 N.Y. 736, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 892 (N.Y. 1951).
98 N.E.2d 705 (Roller v. Stanly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Magalnick v. Empire State Mutual Life Insurance
13 Misc. 2d 468 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Pluchino v. Pluchino
1 A.D.2d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)