Roller v. Meredith
4 Pa. Super. 461, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 146
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an appeal from a judgment ordered by the court below upon a case stated, but the record does not show that a judgment was entered thereon; that any exception was asked for or allowed in the court below. No assignment of error has been filed and there is nothing on this record for us to decide: Shaffer v. Eichert, 132 Pa. 285.
However the case has been examined as if regularly in court and the decision below was correct.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roller v. Meredith, 4 Pa. Super. 461, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 146 (Pa. Ct. App. 1897).
4 Pa. Super. 461 (Roller v. Meredith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Erny's Estate
12 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
City of Philadelphia v. Goldstein
30 Pa. D. & C. 451 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1937)
Bedell v. Oliver H. Bair Co.
15 Pa. D. & C. 405 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Commonwealth v. Barrett
155 A. 95 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
City of Philadelphia v. Atlantic & P. Tel. Co.
109 F. 55 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1901)