Roller v. Maxwell

20 F. Cas. 1136, 3 Blatchf. 142
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 F. Cas. 1136 (Roller v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roller v. Maxwell, 20 F. Cas. 1136, 3 Blatchf. 142 (circtsdny 1853).

Opinion

THE COURT

held:

1. That the official appraisal, not appealed from, was conclusive as to the dutiable value of the goods, when the protest did not point out any violation of law in making the ap-praisement;

2. That the protest, in this instance, did not embrace the question as to the value of the currency in which the invoice was made out; that it related exclusively to the foreign market value; and that that was determined by the report of the appraisers. Tariff Act Aug. 30, 1842, § 17 (5 Stat. 564); Act March 3, 1851, § 2 (9 Stat. 630).

Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gross v. Gross
73 S.E. 961 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1912)
Haight v. Badgeley
15 Barb. 499 (New York Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 1136, 3 Blatchf. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roller-v-maxwell-circtsdny-1853.