Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLER
This text of 58 So. 3d 279 (Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant brought this appeal from an interlocutory order granting opposing counsel’s motion to withdraw. This court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(1); Ward v. State, 753 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Becker & Poliakoff v. King, 642 So.2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to raise the issue in a timely appeal from the final order entered in this case. See, e.g., Scott v. State, 991 So.2d 971, 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Buscemi v. 6060 Realty Carp., 654 So.2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 So. 3d 279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2011 WL 265767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roller-v-cripe-roller-fladistctapp-2011.