Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLER

58 So. 3d 279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2011 WL 265767
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2011
Docket1D09-3281
StatusPublished

This text of 58 So. 3d 279 (Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roller v. CRIPE-ROLLER, 58 So. 3d 279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2011 WL 265767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant brought this appeal from an interlocutory order granting opposing counsel’s motion to withdraw. This court lacks appellate jurisdiction to review the order. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(1); Ward v. State, 753 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Becker & Poliakoff v. King, 642 So.2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to raise the issue in a timely appeal from the final order entered in this case. See, e.g., Scott v. State, 991 So.2d 971, 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Buscemi v. 6060 Realty Carp., 654 So.2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

DISMISSED.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Becker & Poliakoff v. King
642 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Scott v. State
991 So. 2d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Ward v. State
753 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Buscemi v. 6060 Realty Corp.
654 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 So. 3d 279, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 882, 2011 WL 265767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roller-v-cripe-roller-fladistctapp-2011.