Home/Supreme Court/Roller v. Catlett

Roller v. Catlett

245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 133
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 10, 1917
DocketNo. 163
StatusPublished

This text of 245 U.S. 632 (Roller v. Catlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roller v. Catlett, 245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 133 (1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. [633]*633Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.

Mr. John E. Boiler pro sé. Mr. Budolph Bumgardner for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roller-v-catlett-scotus-1917.