Roller v. Armentrout
245 U.S. 642, 38 S. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (2) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roller v. Armentrout, 245 U.S. 642, 38 S. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654 (1918).
245 U.S. 642 (Roller v. Armentrout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
233 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)