Roller v. Armentrout

Supreme Court

Roller v. Armentrout

245 U.S. 642, 38 S. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 28, 1918

DocketNo. 167

StatusPublished

This text of 245 U.S. 642 (Roller v. Armentrout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roller v. Armentrout, 245 U.S. 642, 38 S. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654 (1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Quriam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (2) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Quriam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (2) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 U.S. 642, 38 S. Ct. 221, 62 L. Ed. 527, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roller-v-armentrout-scotus-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack