Rolle v. State
874 So. 2d 685, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7347, 2004 WL 1161621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rolle v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243 →
Opinion
Affirmed. As we did in Hernandez-Molina v. State, 860 So.2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)(en banc), which held that Chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, does not violate the single subject rule, we certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002). Likewise, we certify conflict with the Fifth District’s recent decision in Jones v. State, 872 So.2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)(on rehearing en banc).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rolle v. State, 874 So. 2d 685, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7347, 2004 WL 1161621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
874 So. 2d 685 (Rolle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hernandez-Molina v. State
860 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jones v. State
872 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)