Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rolle v. State

Rolle v. State

416 So. 2d 51, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28726
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1982
DocketNo. 81-2299
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 416 So. 2d 51 (Rolle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolle v. State, 416 So. 2d 51, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28726 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A police officer testified at appellant’s trial that he placed appellant’s photograph in a photographic display for viewing by the alleged victim only after receiving certain undisclosed information from an undisclosed source. The victim then selected appellant’s photograph from the display. We believe the officer’s testimony constituted improper hearsay. Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). However we do not find a sufficient objection by appellant to preserve this error for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beatty v. State
486 So. 2d 59 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Fulmore v. State
483 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Moore v. State
418 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 So. 2d 51, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolle-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.