Rolle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolle v. State

355 So. 2d 491, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15356

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1978·No. No. 77-838·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in excluding two defense alibi witnesses whose names had not been provided to the state prior to trial.

The ground relied on by appellant for reversal has been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and has been found to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in excluding two defense alibi witnesses whose names had not been provided to the state prior to trial.

The ground relied on by appellant for reversal has been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and has been found to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Rolle v. State, 355 So. 2d 491, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15356 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

355 So. 2d 491 (Rolle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related