Rolle v. Judge

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolle v. Judge

310 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13950

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1975

DocketNo. 73-914

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 310 So. 2d 42 (Rolle v. Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rolle v. Judge, 310 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument and upon review of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that appellants have failed to clearly demonstrate reversible error. In particular, there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that a quorum did not exist on August 6, 1971, the date on which action was taken by the appellant to change the name of the church withdrawing its association from the Primitive Baptist congregation and diverting the use of church property. The trial court’s declaration that the actions taken on August 6 were null and void and the relief granted to the appellees was consistent with the foregoing.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument and upon review of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that appellants have failed to clearly demonstrate reversible error. In particular, there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that a quorum did not exist on August 6, 1971, the date on which action was taken by the appellant to change the name of the church withdrawing its association from the Primitive Baptist congregation and diverting the use of church property. The trial court’s declaration that the actions taken on August 6 were null and void and the relief granted to the appellees was consistent with the foregoing.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 So. 2d 42, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolle-v-judge-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack