Rolland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rolland v. State

270 S.E.2d 1, 154 Ga. App. 685, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2341

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 28, 1980·No. 59661·Published

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of armed robbery on the general grounds. We affirm.

In view of the eyewitness testimony of two individuals present at the scene of the crime identifying the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime charged, along with circumstantial evidence implicating defendant with the commission of the offense, we must conclude that a rational trier of fact could reasonably find defendant guilty of the crime of armed robbery beyond á reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560). See also Ross v. State, 149 Ga. App. 189 (2) (253 SE2d 856). This being so, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of armed robbery on the general grounds. We affirm.

In view of the eyewitness testimony of two individuals present at the scene of the crime identifying the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime charged, along with circumstantial evidence implicating defendant with the commission of the offense, we must conclude that a rational trier of fact could reasonably find defendant guilty of the crime of armed robbery beyond á reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560). See also Ross v. State, 149 Ga. App. 189 (2) (253 SE2d 856). This being so, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Rolland v. State, 270 S.E.2d 1, 154 Ga. App. 685, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2341 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

270 S.E.2d 1 (Rolland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related