Rollakanti v. Holy Cross Hospital

699 F. App'x 235
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1953
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 235 (Rollakanti v. Holy Cross Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rollakanti v. Holy Cross Hospital, 699 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Rollakanti appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint after the court had dismissed the complaint in part without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rolla-kanti’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Rollakanti has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the. appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rollakanti-v-holy-cross-hospital-ca4-2017.