Roll v. Timberman
50 N.J. 84
This text of 50 N.J. 84 (Roll v. Timberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roll v. Timberman, 50 N.J. 84 (N.J. 1967).
Opinion
CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
BRUCE E. TIMBERMAN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS AND TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CORA E. MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille and Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr. for the petitioner.
Messrs. Orlando & Cummins and Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon & Munyon for the respondents.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. City of Linden
526 A.2d 1093 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Smith v. Nieves
485 A.2d 1066 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 N.J. 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roll-v-timberman-nj-1967.