Roll v. Timberman
50 N.J. 84
Opinion
CHARLES EDWARD ROLL, ETC., PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
BRUCE E. TIMBERMAN, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS AND TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CORA E. MARTIN, ADMINISTRATRIX, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille and Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr. for the petitioner.
Messrs. Orlando & Cummins and Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon & Munyon for the respondents.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roll v. Timberman, 50 N.J. 84 (N.J. 1967).
50 N.J. 84 (Roll v. Timberman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. City of Linden
526 A.2d 1093 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Smith v. Nieves
485 A.2d 1066 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)