Roll-Die & Mold Decorators, Inc., and R. C. Gutknecht v. W. J. Voit Rubber Corp.

387 F.2d 306
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 1968
Docket21592_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 387 F.2d 306 (Roll-Die & Mold Decorators, Inc., and R. C. Gutknecht v. W. J. Voit Rubber Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roll-Die & Mold Decorators, Inc., and R. C. Gutknecht v. W. J. Voit Rubber Corp., 387 F.2d 306 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find no merit in appellants’ objections relative to jurisdiction, venue, or stay of the trial date, pending Patent Office action. On each of those issues we affirm.

The summary judgment granted below is reversed, upon the ground the record discloses there exist genuine issues of material fact.

In view of this opinion, it is suggested that whatever district court judge tries the contested case, he should reconsider and re-examine the propriety and necessity of the continuation of preliminary injunctive relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
387 F.2d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roll-die-mold-decorators-inc-and-r-c-gutknecht-v-w-j-voit-rubber-ca9-1968.