Rolison v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rolison v. State

618 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4185, 1993 WL 96769

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 1993

DocketNo. 90-3049

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 618 So. 2d 275 (Rolison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rolison v. State, 618 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4185, 1993 WL 96769 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Terry Rolison, challenges a restitution order requiring him to pay restitution in the total amount of $27,300.00. Our examination of the record in this cause reveals that the restitution obligation was not a part of the negotiated plea agreement. Since the sentencing disposition did not follow the terms of the plea agreement, the matter must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. Prior to resentencing, if the trial court again determines to exceed the bounds of the plea agreement, appellant must be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Terry Rolison, challenges a restitution order requiring him to pay restitution in the total amount of $27,300.00. Our examination of the record in this cause reveals that the restitution obligation was not a part of the negotiated plea agreement. Since the sentencing disposition did not follow the terms of the plea agreement, the matter must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. Prior to resentencing, if the trial court again determines to exceed the bounds of the plea agreement, appellant must be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing.

JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

618 So. 2d 275, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4185, 1993 WL 96769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolison-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack