Roli Aroldo Lopez v. State
This text of Roli Aroldo Lopez v. State (Roli Aroldo Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 10, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00177-CR
ROLI AROLDO LOPEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-81302-2018
ORDER Appellant’s brief was initially due May 4, 2019. When it was not filed, we notified
appellant by postcard dated May 8, 2019 and directed him to file a brief and an extension motion
by May 18, 2019. To date, no brief has been filed, and we have had no correspondence from
appellant regarding the brief or the appeal.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Angela Tucker,
Presiding Judge, 199th Judicial District Court; to counsel Stephanie Hudson; and to the Collin
County District Attorney.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roli Aroldo Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roli-aroldo-lopez-v-state-texapp-2019.