Rolfe v. Fingerhut
121 A. 85, 98 N.J.L. 894, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 304
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[896]*896For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Tren chard, Ivaltscii, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rolfe v. Fingerhut, 121 A. 85, 98 N.J.L. 894, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1923).
121 A. 85 (Rolfe v. Fingerhut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.