Rolf v. Heil
148 N.E. 398, 113 Ohio St. 113, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 113, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 244
Opinions
It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, on the authority of Cleveland Railway Co. v. Trendel, etc., 101 Ohio St., 316, 128 N. E., 136.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rolf v. Heil, 148 N.E. 398, 113 Ohio St. 113, 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 113, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 244 (Ohio 1925).
148 N.E. 398 (Rolf v. Heil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merrell, Dir. of Highways v. Matt
182 N.E. 348 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)
Korona Jewelry Music House v. Loveland
157 N.E. 500 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1927)
Shank v. Hamilton Found. & Mach. Co.
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 497 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1926)