Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Virtucio

345 F. App'x 579
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 2009
DocketNo. 2009-1272
StatusPublished

This text of 345 F. App'x 579 (Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Virtucio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Virtucio, 345 F. App'x 579 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court treats the notice of withdrawal, filed by Jaime E. Virtucio and transmitted to this court by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F. App'x 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolex-watch-usa-inc-v-virtucio-cafc-2009.