Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Various John Does
This text of Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Various John Does (Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Various John Does) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 07-272 (RCL) ) VARIOUS JOHN DOES NOS. 1–300, and ) XYZ COMPANIES NOS. 1–20, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)
MEMORANDUM
The Court will, in a separate Order issued today, grant plaintiff’s Motion [56] for Entry of
Default Judgment. The Clerk of the Court entered default as to all defendants on February 17,
2009. All defendants have failed to respond to the entry of default.
Notice of the entry of default against defendants Abdul Ali, Jian Xiu, Kamar Adu,
Mohammed Abdil, and Minh Nguyen was not mailed because these defendants have no fixed
address known by the Court. These defendants—having been personally served on May 29,
October 30, December 6, or December 12 of 2008 (see Return of Service [40], [46])—are
responsible for appraising the Court of an address for correspondence, see Local Civ. R. 11.1,
and their failure to do so does not preclude default judgment.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on March 31, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Various John Does, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolex-watch-usa-inc-v-various-john-does-dcd-2009.