Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Afp Imaging Corp.

Federal Circuit

Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Afp Imaging Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 2012

Docket2012-1260

StatusUnpublished

This text of Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Afp Imaging Corp. (Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Afp Imaging Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Afp Imaging Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC., Appellant,

V.

AFP IMAGING CORPORATION, Appellee.

2012-1260 (Opposition No. 91188993)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

ORDER

Upon consideration of AFP Imaging corporation (AFP lmaging)’s April 5, 2012 letter, the court considers whether Rolex Watch U.S.A.’s appeal should be dismissed as moot.

Rolex has appealed from an order of the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board dismissing Rolex’s opposition to AFP’s application to register the mark ROLL-X for x-ray tables for medical and dental use. AFP informs the court that on March 19, 2012, Rolex withdrew its opposition to AFP’s trademark application

ROLEX WATCH V. AFP IMAGING 2

Accordingly,

lT IS ORDERED TH_ATZ

(1) Rolex Watch is directed to show cause within 14 days of the date of this order why its appeal should not be dismissed as moot.

(2) The briefing schedule is stayed.

FoR THE CoUR'r MAY 2 1 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Gary D. Krugman, Esq. Norman H. Zivin, Esq. 525 . U.S. CDUH'l'-:||.'SHPPEALS FOR THE FEDF.RAL C|HCU|T NAY 2 'I-ZUTZ JAN HURBAI.Y

CLEBK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI