Roldan v. State

819 So. 2d 971, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8760, 2002 WL 1369788
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2002·No. No. 4D01-2194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979).

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roldan v. State, 819 So. 2d 971, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8760, 2002 WL 1369788 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

819 So. 2d 971 (Roldan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DR Lakes, Inc. v. BRANDSMART USA
819 So. 2d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)