Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co.

8 A.D.3d 463, 778 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8426
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover [464]*464damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 7, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated March 12, 2003, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co., 8 A.D.3d 463, 778 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 463 (Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silvering v. Sunrise Family Med., P.C.
2018 NY Slip Op 3556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Selmani v. City of New York
100 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)