Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co.

8 A.D.3d 463, 778 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8426

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 463 (Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roldan v. Seaman Furniture Co., 8 A.D.3d 463, 778 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover [464]*464damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 7, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated March 12, 2003, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover [464]*464damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 7, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to its original determination in an order dated March 12, 2003, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Upon renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 463, 778 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roldan-v-seaman-furniture-co-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack