Roldan v. Molyneux

227 A.D.2d 240, 642 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5205
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about August 15, 1995, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied defendants-appellants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, who was injured as the result of a fall when cleaning for the first time the top of a newly constructed glass enclosure, was not engaged in the type of routine household window washing maintenance work excluded from statutory protection (see, Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 87 NY2d 938). The IAS Court therefore properly imposed liability on defendants for failure to furnish safety devices (Labor Law § 240 [1]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roldan v. Molyneux, 227 A.D.2d 240, 642 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 240 (Roldan v. Molyneux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holiday v. Perry
1 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Chapman v. International Business Machines Corp.
253 A.D.2d 123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)