Rolando Sanchez v. G. Lewis
This text of 615 F. App'x 422 (Rolando Sanchez v. G. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Rolando Esteban Sanchez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment granting in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habe-as petition. We dismiss.
Sanchez raises several challenges to his convictions and sentence for murder and *423 related offenses. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) only as to Sanchez’s claim that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon in a vehicle. While this appeal was pending, the state court dismissed that count. 1 Because Sanchez is no longer in custody for the concealed weapon offense, this court “cannot grant any effectual relief’ in Sanchez’s favor and the certified claim is moot. See Calderon v. Moore, 518 U.S. 149, 150, 116 S.Ct. 2066,135 L.Ed.2d 453 (1996) (per curiam) (internal quotations omitted).
We treat Sanchez’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the COA and deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 F. App'x 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rolando-sanchez-v-g-lewis-ca9-2015.